From Scathing Purple Musings, by Bob Sykes
The narrative the Florida media is advancing on education policy has changed. And not in a way which is favorable for the state’s education power brokers. Jeff Solochek published a column in the Tampa Bay Times on the last day of 2012 in which he observed that “Florida’s reform movement faced its first significant pushback after a more than a decade of ineffective complaining.” Now in today’s Palm Beach Post, John Kennedy builds on his newspaper’s research:
Charter school, voucher and online education companies poured more than $2 million into this fall’s political campaigns, primarily those of Republicans who are again demanding more alternatives to traditional public schools.
My post in August last year detailed the manner these groups merged
. The Post’s research is far more thorough than mine:
The industry promoting charter schools, online education and tax-credit scholarship vouchers spent heavily on Florida campaigns during the 2012 election:
Florida Federation for Children: $1.5 million
Charter Schools USA: $215,450
School Development LLC: $138,000
Apollo Group: $120,500
Academica Management: $100,000
Fla. Association of Public Charter Schools: $35,000
Community Education Partners: $15,000
Argosy University: $11,900
Daytona Education Associates: $9,500
Connections Academy: $6,500
Sources: Florida Division of Elections, Palm Beach Post research
The Post leaves out the personal contributions which Florida Federation for Children chief, John Kirtley made. This from my August post:
Kennedy’s story indicates that the education privatization money of $2 million dwarfs that of Florida’s teacher’s union total of $3.9 million it spent on campaigns. These numbers may be misleading as an Orlando Sentinel
report said that the FEA had only raised $416,000 through its Florida Education Association Advocacy Fund, implying the total spent may be from money the union already had on hand.
Still, as FEA president Andy Ford says, the money the union spends on political activities is “mostly defensive.” Indeed. Aside from voter’s passing the 2002 class size amendment, the state’s teachers haven’t had any legislative victories. And republican legislatures since then have found ways to circumvent the will of voters with new rules and clarifications.
But as a new legislative session approaches and the state’s education policy power brokers still cache their agenda around a fuzzy “choice” theme, the state’s media is beginning to report a different narrative which will be a much more difficult filter to navigate.