The hubris of Education Reformers or how can the mega rich be so dumb? (rough draft)

There was a time when people looked up to rich perhaps a
little envious but at the same time they didn’t think they were any smarter or
any better than anybody else. Somewhere along the way that changed and the
perception became that if you were a middle class stiff you were in that boat
because you were either lazy or not smart enough to get out. Some started
putting the rich on pedestals as if they already didn’t have enough already.
Worse however is that somewhere along the way the mega rich began to believe
they were better and smarter than everybody else and only they could save the
masses from themselves.
Nowhere is this more evident than in education where
millionaires and billionaires have led reform. Educators are far and few
between among their members and the vast majority of them didn’t go to public
school or send their kids to public school either. Despite their lack of
institutional knowledge this hasn’t stopped them from chiming in with the ideas
that a bright 12 year old might come up with while at the same time ignore the
real problems in education and that’s poverty. They don’t understand what it
means to feel hungry or hopeless, afraid or marginalized. Sadly because of this
their feel good crusade to help the American student has seen millions go to
vouchers, charter schools, Teach for America, merit pay, parent trigger
legislation and campaigns that have blamed teachers and they have done far more
harm than good.
From a Time
Magazine article by Judith Warner:
It’s been a good
decade now that the direction of school reform has been greatly influenced by a
number of highly effective Master (and Mistress) of the Universe types: men and
women like Princeton grad Wendy Kopp,
the founder of the Teach for America program, her husband, Harvard graduate
Richard Barth, who heads up the charter school Knowledge Is Power Program, the
hard-charging former D.C. schools chancellor (and Cornell and Harvard grad) Michelle
Rhee and the many hedge fund founders who are now investing significant
resources in the cause of expanding charter schools. Excoriating the state of
America’s union-protected teaching profession and allegedly ossified education
schools, they’ve prided themselves upon attracting “the best and the brightest”
to the education reform cause, whether by luring recent top college graduates
into challenging classrooms or by seducing Harvard Business School or
McKinsey-trained numbers-crunchers away from Wall Street to newly lucrative
executive positions in educationally themed social entrepreneurship.
The chief promise
of their brand of reform — the results of which have been mixed, at best —
seems to be that they can remake America’s students in their own high-achieving
image. By evaluating all students according to the same sort of testable
rubrics that, when aced, propelled the reformers into the Ivy League and
beyond, society’s winners seem to believe they can inspire and guide society’s
losers, inoculating them against failure with their own habits of success, and
forever disproving the depressingly fatalistic ’70s-style liberal idea that
things like poverty and poor health care and hunger and a chaotic family life
can, indeed, condemn children to school failure.
In short they want
to put public school kids through the type of education they wouldn’t let their
kids go through. The finest prep schools in America are staffed by trained
educators not hobbyists, the tests they take are limited and none have carry the
same repercussions of the average students standardized tests have and their
schedules are filled with arts and electives something that has been phased out
of many public schools replaced by test prep classes. Yet for some reason they
feel the poor kids at PS this or that should be subjected to this. 
They also ignore
the fact that they have made school such drudgery for kids by putting them into
one-size fits all test based curriculum. They ignore what happens in
neighborhoods and homes and instead blame the teachers who aren’t able to over
come the dehibilitating effects of poverty. They ignore the fact that kids in
schools without poverty zoom to the top of the international rankings. These are
inconvenient truths.
Instead they give
red herrings like teachers come from the bottom third of their classes and say “look
at Finland if they can do it why can’t we.” They offer choices like vouchers
and charter schools that lack accountability,  while at they same time complaining about teachers saying anybody
can do it and all the while kids, especially the ones that need the most help
suffer; the victim of the hubris of mega rich reformers.   
Also from the
Times piece, S. Paul Reville, the Massachusetts Secretary of Education, blogged in Education
 that reformers need now
to think beyond the numbers and “admit that closing achievement gaps is not as
simple as adopting a set of standards, accountability and instructional
improvement strategies.” In Massachusetts, he wrote, “We have set the nation’s
highest standards, been tough on accountability and invested billions in
building school capacity, yet we still see a very strong correlation between
socioeconomic background and educational achievement and attainment. It is now
clear that unless and until we make a more active effort to mitigate the impediments
to learning that are commonly associated with poverty, we will still be faced
with large numbers of children who are either unable to come to school or so
distracted as not to be able to be attentive and supply effort when they get
there.” Reville called for “wraparound services” that would allow schools to
provide students with a “healthy platform” from which they could begin to work
on learning.
The Eli Broads,
Gary Chartrands, Bill Gates, Michelle Rhees, and Wendy Kopps of the world don’t
get it. They think we can test and demonize teachers out of the mess they have
helped create by steering policy away from the real problem, poverty, facing
our schools.  

I am told my grandfather despite not being mega rich
was a very smart man. He worked for the old Ma Bell and he raised 5 kids who
never had a lot but who never wanted for anything either. He knew a lot more
about educating kids than the above reformers did and that’s because he entered
most situations not thinking he was the smartest man in the room preferring to
listen and learn instead.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *