Ugh, from the I can’t make this stuff up file, Scott Shine one of the few supporters of amendment 8 admits it was against the law, but that didn’t stop him from supporting it anyways.
Shine, the only board member advocating for the amendment, said he didn’t find the ballot language misleading but he’s not surprised by the ruling.
“Those who had been participating in the case said that the judge seemed to have a hard time understanding the issues at play,” Shine said. ”We had a sense this judge was probably going to rule against us.”
But he said he’s not upset with the ruling as it’s “just another step in the process” of education reform. He said the ruling will “undoubtedly” be appealed.
“There’s a lot of different options,” Shine said. “One is that a higher court could rule in our favor. Two, at some point the ballot language could be changed so that’s it’s consistent with the law.”
“Two, at some point the ballot language could be changed so that’s it’s consistent with the law.”
Right there he is saying the ballot language is misleading that it isn’t “consistent with the law. Shine had a rare bout of candor there.
Everyone who has been following 8 knows what it is about and that is giving away local control to charter schools.
Later in the article he says the part he really liked was term limits for school board members. Um not only is he a one term wonder, but Duval already has term limits and other districts should they choose have them too. We don’t need a constitutional amendment to make it happen.
Shine has been historically bad on the board and he can’t be gone soon enough.