Just an fYI on the
social media policy, this was proposed as a policy addition from Dr. Vitti and
was taken up by your liberal friends on the board in the policy review
subcommittee (against my wishes)a month ago. They were unanimous in moving it
to next years employee professional standards. So, you only have a few months
to add to your resume of false and reckless statements. Sadly, I did not even
get a chance to vote on it. So, give your thanks to Hall, Wright and Couch for
the “anti-Guerrieri” code of conduct addition next fall. While I am
highly disappointed I did not get in on the action, and still want to bring it
forward as a policy addition as originally submitted by the superintendent, so
it can take affect in before the end of this school year.
that above shows real growth from Scott, usually he just leaves mean and nasty
comments posted anonymously.
out is “your liberal friends”. The school board positions are supposed to be
non-partisan, it shouldn’t matter if you are liberal or conservative or
whatever, because what’s best for our schools should trump all political
leanings. The fact that Scott sees fit to call Hall, Wright and Couch “liberal”
calling there? I get it calling somebody “liberal” isn’t like calling somebody
retarded but I get the distinct impression he was trying to belittle and
marginalize when he wrote that, as if liberals are somehow less worthy of
Batman. He writes, “So, you only have a few months to add to your resume of
false and reckless statements.” Is he telling me to get my resume ready? Is he
saying that the district is going to put an end to the blog? Both are
threatening. He’s a school board member and here he is threatening a teacher he
disagrees with, he’s not giving an alternate point of view, he’s not defending
his decisions or positions or asking readers to explore alternate points of
view. He’s saying get your resume ready because next school year you are on
your way out.
to a third person and seemed off the cuff and superintendent Vitti said he felt
like it created a hostile work environment. Shine on the other hand addressed
me and sent me a 141 word note. Should I follow the supers lead and look into legal
Then think about this. Connie Hall sent her text to one person, where Shine left his comment on a blog that on good days gets thousands and thousand of hits. He wanted to make sure his comment was widely read, and do you know who most of the readers of the blogs are? Teachers, that is who. His threat wasn’t just to me, it was to teachers as well. He just said look at me, the district can silence whoever it doesn’t like. That’s a chilling message for a district that already has a reputation for quashing dissent and punishing teachers who speak out.
false and reckless, couldn’t I consider that to be libel or if he has said it
to people slander? I have opinions about how things are being run, I do but
last I checked it was still legal to have opinions. Furthermore, if I get
something wrong, I own up to it on the blog because I understand it does my argument
no good to get things wrong. I once wrote a blog saying Scott was a lifelong member
of the government dole and after he pointed out I got it wrong I not only retracted it but I apologized.
when he should have written effect, but have you read one of my blogs because
if you have, you know I can really forgive that.
thoughts about Mr. Shine and that is he is in way over his head, and that he is
driven by his ideology not by what’s best for children, schools and teachers. The question I would like you
to ask is how isn’t what he did today just as bad if not worse than what Connie