Parents are the last people who should pick their children’s schools.

What happens when a parent picks a lemon for car? It can be inconvenient
and expensive but usually manageable but what happens when a parent picks a lemon
for a charter school? They are sold a bill of goods and the school does not
deliver which is a real possibility in Florida as over 260 have opened and
failed leaving communities and families in a lurch and of those that remain as a group they perform worse than their public school counterparts.

The same question can be
asked about private schools that take vouchers. We have no idea how they are
doing because the entire system is set up to resist accountability. Sure there may be
good ones but there are definitely terrible ones too, terrible ones that
parents for whatever reason picked to send their children too.

Then what if a parent has crazy ideas about religion, the government,
homosexuals or minorities? Breaking that cycle becomes impossible if the child
is attending a school which spouts the same ideas.What if they get bad information from a movement that wants to undercut and privatize public schools so they can profit off of them?
Picking a school isn’t like picking milk or even a car, we
are talking about real setbacks that can hinder a child for life if the parent
chooses wrong. Parents shouldn’t be required to make a decision that could
handicap their children for a lifetime or be convinced to pick wrong as many
charter schools and private schools are now advertising.
Instead parents should be able to depend on a system of high
quality public schools that have the resources that they need to assure an
excellent education. Something that has been made even more difficult as Florida
has set up a parallel system of charters and vouchers that siphon resources
away from public schools.
I am not saying parents shouldn’t be involved but often the
same people that say parents should have more choices are also blaming them for problems with their children by not being
involved. At the end of the day parents are being asked to make a decision that
most do not have the right information to make, while school choice supporters
hope, cross their fingers, that the free market works it out.
Dr. Raymond of the Stanford Credo Charter project recently
said, I actually am kind of a pro-market kinda
girl. But it doesn’t seem to work in a choice environment for education. I’ve
studied competitive markets for much of my career. That’s my academic focus for
my work. And (education) is the only industry/sector where the market mechanism
just doesn’t work. I think it’s not helpful to expect parents to be the agents
of quality assurance throughout the state. I think there are other supports
that are needed… The policy environment really needs to focus on creating much
more information and transparency about performance than we’ve had for the 20
years of the charter school movement. We need to have a greater degree of
oversight of charter schools. But I also think we have to have some oversight
of the overseers.
The pro-market reform Thomas B. Fordham Foundation paid for
this study she was commenting on.
This isn’t to say choice shouldn’t have a role to play at
all but it should come under the public school umbrella as they provide more
and various magnet or industry certification programs so more kids’ abilities
and interests can be served. Then if there is a specific program not being
offered by a district we can look at vouchers and charters as they are used to supplement
public schools not to replace and privatize them.
The answer is to fix the issues in our schools and to supply
them with adequate resources, not to outsource our kids futures to maybes and possibilities.
Parents have a difficult enough job, let’s leave the
educating to the professionals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *