ten years in Florida and never have I experienced the type of fear and
intimidation that I have endured either in my service to our nation in the
Air Force or in any other capacity in which I have worked.
to lift our students to a higher level of learning to best prepare them
for citizenship and careers. We would like to believe that the work of
our state’s leaders is to truly improve our schools to ensure that educators
are doing the work necessary to best serve our state and its future.
I take issue, however with the manner in which we evaluate
our educators to gauge their work to teach our students and future
leaders. The CAST evaluation system, in my opinion is grievously flawed
because the value added formula actually ignores the value of the
work that educators do every day.
observing educators is limited to small windows of opportunity to grade
teachers according to a rubric that is well-intentioned but restricts them to
what they actually see in the classroom. In this finite amount of time,
principals and their designees only are allowed to record what they see
and hear. I find fault in this because it provides no real context
with which to judge classroom performance.
see that a teacher is sitting down to take attendance. This is behavior
that is frowned upon as teachers are expected to be walking around the room and
constantly hovering over their students. For example, a principal can
walk into a classroom and hear students talking about something other than
their work. It is the teacher’s fault that they are not limiting their
conversation to the work at hand. For example, a principal can walk into
a classroom and observe that students are cleaning up the room to prepare
for the next class. There is no instruction going on, therefore there is
no learning going on.
impression he or she has of the classroom is written in stone. It is
because of this that I believe that CAST was designed to be a gotcha to drum
out allegedly bad teachers for what may have been an anomaly in
their performance that includes 180 days of constant work to help our
evaluation which is tied to student learning gains. Even with
value added factors, this is a set-up in my opinion. The value
of student learning gains cannot and should not be forced to rely on students’
performance on tests only. Based on this metric, I am the second-worst
social studies teacher in my school and this will become public
knowledge when these CAST scores become public record in accordance with
Beyond the numbers, the state sees no value in my:
not eat on any given morning.
communicate with parents.
on classroom learning.
promote safe and civil learning.
mock trials) for students.
cultures are appreciated.
for students in need.
families to communicate.
for my students.
into my classwork.
vain because I have received more than my fair share of criticism for not
‘caring’ about my students because I fail to kowtow to the test through
the same bureaucratic red tape and education fads that I have worked in good
faith to comply with but inevitably are replaced by
something else, negating my previous efforts. The state sees
what they want to see, even if it means slandering or ignoring my work.
to leave work each day because there is always something else to work on or
complete and it is often the custodians who remind me when they are locking up
the school. I am disappointed because there is no metric for the
dedication that I have for my students and my school, and yet there is plenty
of punishment lined up for me is I fail to make the grade for my students.
This is not the usual ranting of an lazy
union flunky who wants to rest on his laurels. There have been days
when I was sick and still went to work because it was my ultimate
responsibility to serve the public. There have been days when I went to
work on sick days to collect work to complete in my sick bed.
Instead of appreciation, the usual condemnation that I receive from critics
continues because I am a victim of the trite stereotypes that we are all bad
teachers who get what is coming to us.
pastures. I should have left after being hospitalized for two
weeks last year. I should have left after dealing with students who did
not want to do any work no matter what incentives, prizes and rewards I offer.
I should have left after my test scores remained stagnant in spite of
all of my most sincere efforts. I stay, however, because I trust that our
state’s leaders will finally hear what our educators have to say about CAST and
its unintended consequences. I keep teaching because I know that a
better day for education is ahead and because there will always be a
better day for our students if we all believe that we are working as a team for