and it is time to evaluate his performance. When he arrived Duval County was
nowhere close to where it should be and he was like a breath of fresh air.
After years of stagnation finally many of us felt we could be optimistic again.
However we shouldn’t let that initial feeling of euphoria stop us from
examining the things that he is done because we have to know if things are
truly different of if we are just getting more of the same.
schools and teachers can only do so much and there has to be a partnership
between parents and schools if we really want to be successful. I however have
no idea how it is doing, if it’s a swing and a miss, home run or something in
cut them. These important classes give kids a break from their academic courses
and play to many of their strengths and likes too. A concern though is some of
these teachers are seeing two classes at a time which makes things difficult
for teachers and students a like.
ignored, under the previous administration. Middle schools and high schools now
have deans and ISSP teachers’ positions that were also often cut in recent
years. The problems I hear though is ISSP teachers and deans are often called
to fill other positions and still kids don’t receive proper consequences or
what we now call response cost for bad behavior. Furthermore I wonder why the
administration, who knows there was a problem, if not why bring in so many deans and ISSP
teachers, spent so much time arguing with Judge Davis when he brought up the
problem of violence in our schools.
moves. Chief concerns before he arrived were whom you know not your
ability-determined promotions and the fact we had a lot of bullies masquerading
as administrators wandering the halls of our schools. The problem however is if he replaces them with the same type
of administrators or just moves them around then we will be right back where we
started. We need leaders who can motivate and enthuse their staffs not ones who
use fear and intimidation.
even though his other actions seem to indicate he doesn’t believe in thr program. If you
didn’t know, Teach for America takes non-education majors puts them through a
five week course and then into our neediest classrooms where they serve for two
years or the exact opposite of what we now to be best for our children. We also
don’t need them, it’s not like a few years ago when we were advertising in
India, Canada and the business world for teachers. He has also told his personal
people not to staff TFA teachers at John E. Ford in response to parents
complaints about turnover and then with his experienced teacher initiative he
admits we need our best and most experienced teachers at our neediest schools,
the same places we have been shuffling TFA into for the last five years. At a recent
board workshop he said he wanted to funnel them just into high schools going
forward but how does that make sense as high school kids have to pass certain
tests or they don’t graduate. I don’t understand why the districts number one
priority isn’t putting experienced teachers or people who might grow into
lifelong educators into our classrooms.
pay teachers up to sixty thousand dollars over three years to work at our
neediest schools on it’s face sounds amazing however when you look at it with a
critical eye it kind of falls apart. First a plan like this has never worked
and where the money being offered is a lot more than ever offered before
it can still only be used to fill one hundred percent of the targeted
percent of the targeted positions and where there were big gains in elementary
schools, there were no gains in middle school and they didn’t even try it in high schools (where he wants to send TFA teachers).
Then when the money turned off teachers began to leave in droves and I can’t imagine things being any different here.
to educate our children, we need art, music, history, p.e. English, math
teachers and guidance counselors working together to be successful. The
superintendent obviously thinks English, math and sometimes science teachers
are much more important as they will be the only ones eligible for the bonus. I
have grave concerns about what this huge influx of cash is going morale. In effect we are creating a two-tiered
teacher system where one group of teachers is worth a lot more than the other. The
short of it is he is making a very expensive gamble with zero evidence that
backs it up, which makes me wonder where he got the idea.
cozy relationship with the chair of the state board of education is a good
thing and if we had a competent chair I would probably agree with you even if I
didn’t believe in everything they did. People are going to have legitimate
disagreements. The thing is we don’t have a competent person running the board and I think I can make a case by looking at some of things he has said and done. He said we needed to stay
away from controversial subjects that don’t reflect Florida’s values like
homosexuality. He said we need a citrus grower on the state board of education
and now we have one Andy Tuck, who has also disavowed evolution and promoted creationism. Under his watch we have had multiple commissioners of education, 4 if we count Stewart twice and the accountability system has been changed so much that nobody believes it
has credibility any more. He has said the class size amendment was a waste of
money and he initiated Florida’s race based goals and here is a spoiler alert
for you, we don’t have very high expectations for our African American
students. Then just recently he arbitrarily cut public comments back at a BOE meeting from three minutes to two. Chartrand is a grocer who used his money to get on the board and it
is showing and this is the person who seems to have Vitti’s ear as they have been seen together at conferences that promote charter schools and at education policy forums. One of the
great things Vitti did when he first arrived was travel the city and listen to
the people but now I wonder if that was just window dressing.
can’t help but think it is because of this close relationship with Chartrand an advocate of the corporate reform movements (charters, vouchers, stepped up teacher evaluations, merit pay etc.) that Vitti is
bringing in the New Teacher Project and ideology driven group supposedly here
just to do our climate surveys, surveys that parents, teachers and school
members take which hopefully reveal how schools are running. The New Teacher Projects guiding principal
is there are lots of bad teachers and if we can develop better evaluation tools we can replace them and things will improve. I was hoping our super’s position
was we have lots of good teachers and if we can develop and support them things
will improve. Why bring in this group? Why not go to the Jacksonville public
Education Fund who already partners with the district on lots of projects and
is known for their statistical analysis of data? I think we can all agree
knowing how our schools are doing is a very important thing but I really
question the use of this group to tell us.
I think the jury is
still out. I like some of the things he has done or at least tried to do even
if thus far the results have been mixed at best and some of the things he has done have caused me to scratch my head. But what scares me is the
people of Jacksonville just seem so relieved that there has been a change they
may not be paying attention and if we don’t pay attention we will be in trouble.