Sen. Jeff Clemens, D-Lake Worth, filed senate bill 452 last week which would
require charter schools to meet a specific instructional need that local
district schools can’t in order to obtain approval.
the needs that the (traditional) public school system can’t,’’ Clemens told The
Florida Current. “If they’re just going to do the same thing that we’re
doing in public schools then I think it is a poor use of our tax resources.’’
how hundreds of Charter schools have opened and close in Florida including
about a half dozen since this school year began and districts often complain charter
schools both lack innovation (the whole premise behind charter schools) and often
run counter to their strategic plans. In my home town an under enrolled high
school now has two new charter high schools within three miles of it.
surprisingly asking for reasonable restrictions has charter school supports in
From Redefined Ed: Not surprisingly, his bill drew criticism from charter
school supporters, including Jim Horne, a former Florida legislator and
education commissioner who lobbies for Charter Schools USA.
years of Florida charter schools when we have statistical data that clearly
shows that Florida charter schools are outperforming district managed schools
in most grade levels and gaining increasing market share that suddenly we see
legislation that is aimed at severely limiting the growth of charter schools,’’
Horne said in an email. “In other words, if you can’t compete with them then
let’s just stop them from opening in the first place.”
is no clear statistical data that says charters as a group, despite numerous
advantages, are performing any better, though with almost 250 having closed
over the years you would expect the group to improve somewhat. Then just
yesterday Doug Tuthill from step up for Students the group that is paid
millions in public money to manage Florida’s voucher program that districts
should not compete with charter schools and vouchers. Most charter school
advocates aren’t interested in playing fair nor are they interested in doing
what’s best for children. They just want to see them spread unchecked and damn
the consequences.I wonder if there were any restriction despite repeated failure they would find reasonable.
I think they have a limited role to replace as a supplement to our public
schools, not the replacements for that many who by the way are also profiting
off of them think they should be. Furthermore there are so many bad Charter
schools that the entire industry gets one black eye after another when they close
or continuously do poorly. Even charter school advocates should want reasonable
restrictions because they protect the good charter schools from the cadre of
people operating them just to make a buck.